Obama Administration Makes Controversial Appointment

By Dana Commandatore

 

Excuse me Mr. President, but did you know your recent appointee to the President’s Committee for People with Intellectual Disabilities, Peter Bell of Autism Speaks, has a long history of supporting pseudo-science that can harm children?  It’s true, Autism Speaks’ EVP of Programs and Services supports the widely debunked and incredibly harmful theory that vaccines cause autism. 

Many people don’t know that one of the most important people in the Autism Speaks camp is an anti-vaxer.  It would be an embarrassment to Autism Speaks if they had to admit that they still hold onto a bogus theory that could potentially kill children.  Thank goodness Left Brain/Right Brain’s Kevin Leitch is paying attention.

There is more. In January of 2009, Autism Speaks withdrew its support of the Inter-Agency Autism Coordinating Committee’s (IACC) Strategic Plan for Autism Research when IACC made a decision not to include research objectives connecting vaccines to autism.  As a result, Alison Singer, a high-ranking official from Autism Speaks resigned.  In an interview with NEWSWEEK, Singer stated:

At some point, you have to say, "This question has been asked and answered and it's time to move on." We need to be able to say, "Yes, we are now satisfied that the earth is round."

Maybe it is wrong to assume that Bell--being the high-level autism advocate that he is--actually is a tinfoil-hat-wearing fool.  Perhaps his views have changed since Wakefield has been discredited.  Therefore I’d like to ask him a simple question:

Mr. Bell, do you still believe that vaccines cause autism?

While we are waiting for an answer, I’d like to discuss the other problem I have with Peter Bell and Autism Speaks.   In their mission statement, Autism Speaks says they are “dedicated to funding global biomedical research into the causes, prevention, treatments, and cure for autism".  Bell’s goal is to eliminate autism therefore I do not feel he would be concerned with improving the quality of life of people with intellectual disabilities.  He would rather see the disability prevented, treated, “cured”.

Why not eliminate autism and other intellectual disabilities, right?  I mean all you hear from parents is how devastating and horrible it is to raise an autistic child.  Wrong. There is an entire community of autistic adults, therapists, parents and educators that would rather we focus on their quality of life instead of figuring out a way to prevent them from being born. As a society, our goal should not be to destroy what we don’t understand—especially when it is a human life.

As you can see, there is much more work we need to do to change the conversation. Please reconsider Mr. President, it's not too late to do the right thing. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • No trackbacks exist for this post.
Comments

  • 1/12/2012 8:26 PM Brooks wrote:
    Love this!
    Reply to this
  • 1/12/2012 9:48 PM Terry Rawlinson wrote:
    Is it possible to copy this & send it to the white house? I would do so if permission by author is allowed.
    Reply to this
    1. 1/12/2012 10:23 PM Rethinking Autism wrote:
      I am the author and I am fine with you sending it to anyone and everyone, especially The White House.  Thank you. --Dana
      Reply to this
  • 1/13/2012 5:04 AM Linda J Hamati wrote:
    Are you at all concerned that your position as a conservative blogger is a problem when you compose a message to a president with whom you don't align yourself? I consider myself a local autism advocate and made it a point when I took on that role, to step back from politics because I autism issues transcends philosophical division - you will find people from all political persuasions are anti-vaccine. Reality is that half of the population may not share my political views and human nature leads us to ignore everything said by those we don't agree with on just one point. Also, even though I've never bought into "vaccines cause autism," I think most reasonable people believe in keeping an open mind; I still believe it could be possible for a handful of susceptible children to react to the unbelievable number of vaccines they receive, especially when given in combinations meant to make it more convenient for the adults. I am a believer that "no link" does not mean that vaccines are always 100% safe for 100% of children, and that there is at least a little bit of middle ground when it comes to vaccines and autism. But yeah, everything you say about Autism Speaks is perfect. Just have to make sure the message hits its intended target.
    Reply to this
    1. 1/17/2012 3:20 PM Rethinking Autism wrote:
      My plan is to hold both sides accountable.  I praised the President when he nominated Ari Ne'eman for the NCD. Giving Autism Speaks more of a voice is a bad idea IMO.  This is the President's call, so I have to call him out on it whether I agree with him or not on other issues.  Sadly, many people have lost all sense of reason when it comes to vaccines.  There is no link betweens vaccines and autism.  I have never said that vaccines are 100% safe.  Nothing is 100% safe.  
      Reply to this
  • 1/19/2012 6:06 PM Billy Cresp wrote:
    Why would someone not favor improving quality of life if they favor cure? How can't they have the same result? Think of the quality of life resulting from a cure getting individuals the abilities they need to use. It's not about parents, but concerns having a bearable life.
    Reply to this
Leave a comment

Submitted comments are subject to moderation before being displayed.

 Name (required)

 Email (will not be published) (required)

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.